Shikyo's Ratings: 3 outta 5 PoPcOrNz!
I'd set such high expectations because the main plot surrounds an idea of life... Life, stifled under the oppression of one belief structure aka religion.
Perhaps that's why the movie was a crashing disappointment for me... Me, the non-religious one.
Oh well, it's a really cute movie nonetheless =)
Like many novel-to-movie adaptions, Northern Lights was probably picked cleaned of its important chunks and strung together in the hopes of creating some sort of cohesive story. Unfortunately, trying to squeeze a 400+ page novel into a two hour movie just about never works. And it usually results with a very rushed storytelling, little room for character development, especially if a large cast is involved, and parts of the story sometimes end up being warped beyond recognition.
I've not read the book yet, but I'm pretty sure I nailed two outta three.
If you're a fan of the book, I don't think you'd like the movie... then again, I may be wrong. So please, do correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not asking whether or not you enjoyed the visual effects... because I will agree that there's nothing like a movie to bring a book to life. But what I'm asking is whether you liked what the movie DID to the book in terms of story progression, character development and all the stuff that made the book GOOD.
And if you're a fan of cute furry animals, you will absolutely LOVE the movie. You'll absolutely fall in love with Pantalaimon (Pan), Lyra's Daemon. Animators did an amazing job with his transformations, and his voice actor really brought out the playful yet cautious character of the little daemon.
I'll be touching on the "taboo" religion topic now, so if you're extremely sensitive to the subject matter, feel free to skip down and continue to be ignorant to reason =)
According to Wikipedia (because I've not read the book) the book's anti-religion message was diluted. So what we have now is a simple movie about an orphaned child (as most kiddie stories are based on) with a special object/power (as most fantasy stories are based on) who sets out on a mission -- to find her kidnapped friend -- and along the way she uncovers the truth about her parents (as most orphan-kid stories develop into). A thought-provoking book reduced to a kid's fantasy movie. Argh >_<
The author's original intent was to point out how religious dogmas tend to hide scientific proof by destroying evidence and blinding the populace with words from an invisible "higher" being. Too bad this was downplayed because I like watching movies with real lessons and questions being tossed around.
Here's where you stop reading
if you haven't seen the film,
and you intend to do so
* A * H * E * A * D *
The Subliminal Messaging: It wasn't clear at all.
If I had not know of the anti-theist agenda behind the book, I would never have spotted it. Only upon reading the book (or in my case, reading up on the background of the book), do you realize that the Magisterium represents dogma (aka religious supporters)... dogma spread through people who want you to believe that they know what's best for you and they want to save "innocent" kids from something that they think is "bad" or "evil." And there's Asriel who represents the scientific community -- people wrapped up in unravelling the mysteries of the universe. And lastly, there's Lyra + Co. who represent people who don't like having other people's beliefs shoved down their throats.
The Magickal Golden Compass: Wasn't really prominent.
Lyra reads the compass by turning it's dials to point at symbols to phrase her question, and the compass will, in turn, point to symbols to phrase it's answer. For a movie that's called "The Golden Compass," they spent very little time on HOW Lyra used the compass to get her answers. It was only explained ONCE. Subsequently, the answers just magically appeared for the audience to see. The last thing I wanted was more spoonfed answers =( By doing so, the movie killed the wonder component and it effectively dumbed-down the movie.
The Daemons: It's pronounced Day-mon gawdammit!
Daemon should've been pronounced as Day-mon not Dee-mon >_< The only reason I'd ever accept "mispronounciation/mis-spelling" is if the novel and the movie couldn't have the word "Demon" flashed about to "protect" the younger audience. Meaning it's supposed to be Demon but it's spelt Daemon, therefore it's a safe word??? I dunno... O_o
The Daemons (again): The concept is utterly confuzing...
Having an animal soul or an animal guide isn't a new concept -- the native americans had it too. But the story adds on to that concept, making these animal souls tangible and if it's harmed, their human counterpart will also feel the pain in a similar way. Knowing this, why did Mrs Coulter slapped her own Daemon monkey >_< Also, in the story the Magisterium strives to split the animal Daemon from the kids to protect them from the effects of Dust... but WHY? Most of these kids don't even know Dust exists! And HOW does the knowledge of Dust's existance damage the Magisterium's belief structure? And WHAT does the Magisterium's belief structure revolve around? These answers aren't made clear in the movie =(
I'd definitely catch the other movies when they come out and I'd definitely find some time to read the books because I think it's worth the read. To wrap it all up, lemme introduce my Daemon Zyrxy!
Edit: There was supposed to be a cool flashy thingie here but goldencompassmovie webbie has since taken down its answer-this-questionnaire-while-we-randomly-conjure-up-a-cute-animal-spirit program >_< Zyrxy's a male raven. I thought the name was cool =3