CLICK HERE FOR FULL STORY
I cannot believe that in this day and age, there are some people who refuse to leave their little cave holes of ignorance. They're still plugging their ears and squeezing their eyes shut, sheltering themselves from the real world because it just isn't to their liking.
But what can you expect from a group of deluded old fogies -- the same bunch who believe they are remotely capable of rapping. For pete's sake, it's time to get out and taste reality for what it is!
So what do I think defines a "relationship"?
It's a connection between people and the last time I checked, people consisted of any persons of any race, gender, age, etc. We've got a country pledge that speaks of "equality," but if you so happen to fall in love with someone of the same gender, you'll find yourself shoved into the "indecent" column. And in the eyes of the law and media, you won't even be considered an equal, you can even wind up in JAIL for being "indecent" in your own home. And the thing I don't know why so many people don't get is this -- people are people -- everyone's the same living breathing human being but yet there are discriminations all over the world.
To me, there's something wrong with an equality that isn't equal.
What do I think defines an "acceptable" family unit?
First of all, it should NOT be confined to archaic ideologies. People should be able to define how their individual family unit works. After all, a family is a bunch of people you love and live with and you have close relationships to each other. I feel that as long as no one's getting hurt and as long as everyone in the family unit is happy -- who's to say that your family unit isn't acceptable???
Does the government or the law really have any business at all poking their noses into someone's personal definition of a family unit? And on the issue of morals and ethics, where are the statistics to prove that loving someone of the same gender affects a person's morals and ethics? Do we see more criminals who are gay? And does the media really have any business defining what can and cannot be exposed to the public? Doesn't the media already have something called a rating system, for people to exercise SELF censorship?
I think it's seriously time we start answering these questions rationally and without age-old feelings of ignorance to things we don't understand.
* * * * *
I'm gonna side track and finally say something about that infamous rap made by above mentioned old fogies. I can't believe there was all that media hype over the video's success ... "OMG it's viral! OMG people are watching it!" ... that was just a painful attempt to blindside the public into believing MDA's NOT making utter fools of themselves. Newsflash guys, a content is only made viral if it comes really close to touching the extremes of:
- OMFG (this is so good)
- OMGWTF (this is so shocking)
- WTF (this makes me angry)
- WTFROFL (this is so bad)
- ROFLMAO (this is so funny)
- AWWW (this is so cute)
It doesn't take a genius to figure out which corner MDA's "rap" sits.
